The making of a Sarvodaya Sannyasin

Once upon a time, in a nation corruption was at its zenith and then ….

Posted by Gopal on April 8, 2011


Once upon a time, in a nation corruption was at its zenith and then ….

Ref: http://www.icac.org.hk/new_icac/eng/abou/history/main_2.html

Corruption on the Rampage. Hong Kong was in a state of rapid change in the 1960s and 70s. The massive growth in population and fast expansion of the manufacturing industry accelerated the pace of social and economic development. The Government, while maintaining social order and delivering the bare essentials in housing and other services, was unable to meet the insatiable needs of the swelling population. This provided a fertile environment for the unscrupulous. Many people had to take the “backdoor route” simply to earn a living and secure other than basic services. “Tea money”, “black money”, “hell money” – whatever its name – became not only familiar to many Hong Kong people, but accepted with resignation as a necessary way of life.

The Victims. Corruption was rampant in the public sector. Ambulance crews would demand tea money before picking up a sick person. Even hospital amahs asked for “tips” before giving patients a bedpan or a glass of water. Offering bribes to the right officials was also necessary when applying for public housing, schooling and other public services. Corruption was particularly serious in the Police Force. Corrupt police officers offered protection to vice, gambling and drug activities. Law and order was under threat. Many in the community had fallen victim to corruption. And yet, they swallowed their anger. (Does not it read like what our own country, India, has been facing in last 6 decades? Read on…)

Community Backlash. Corruption had become a major social problem in Hong Kong, but the Government at the time seemed powerless to deal with it. The community’s patience was running thin and more and more people began to vent their anger on the Government’s futile attempts at tackling the problem. In the early 70s, a new and potent force of public opinion emerged. People pressed incessantly for the Government to take decisive action to fight graft. Public resentment escalated to new heights when a corrupt expatriate police officer under investigation was able to flee Hong Kong. The case proved to be the last straw.

Last straw. Controlling assets of over HK$4.3 million, Peter Godber, a Chief Police Superintendent, was under investigation in 1973. It was suspected that his unearned wealth had been obtained from corrupt means. But Godber managed to slip out of the territory undetected during the week given to him by the Attorney General to explain the source of his assets. Godber’s escape unleashed a public outcry. Students spearheaded a mass rally in Victoria Park, protesting and condemning the Government for failing to tackle the corruption problem. Demanding prompt government action, protesters with slogans like “Fight Corruption, Arrest Godber” insisted that Godber be extradited to stand trial.

Answering the Call In response to mounting public demand, the Government was quick to take action. Following Godber’s escape on June 8, 1973, Sir Alastair Blair-Kerr, a Senior Puisne Judge, was appointed to form a Commission of Inquiry into Godber’s escape. He compiled two reports. The first detailed the circumstances of Godber’s escape. In his Second Report, Sir Alastair pointed out that “responsible bodies generally feel that the public will never be convinced that Government really intends to fight corruption unless the Anti-Corruption Office is separated from the Police…” In the wake of the Blair-Kerr reports, the then Governor Sir Murray MacLehose articulated for an independent anti-corruption organisation in a speech delivered to the Legislative Council in October 1973.

Decisive Action. “I think the situation calls for an organisation, led by men of high rank and status, which can devote its whole time to the eradication of this evil.” Sir Murray told legislators. “A further and conclusive argument is that public confidence is very much involved. Clearly the public would have more confidence in a unit that is entirely independent, and separated from any department of the Government, including the Police.” Many in the community sensed the wind of change at this time. They started to see the Government setting the stage for the birth of an effective anti-corruption regime.

The Birth of ICAC. The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) was established in February 1974. Since its inception, the Commission has been committed to fighting corruption using a three-pronged approach of law enforcement, prevention and education. The ICAC’s first important task was to bring Godber to justice. In early 1975, Godber was extradited from England to stand trial. The charges were a conspiracy offence and one of accepting bribes. Godber was found guilty on both counts and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. Godber’s extradition and prosecution were an unmistakable statement of ICAC’s determination and resolve to eradicate corruption. It was this landmark case that kicked off a new start against corruption and the beginning of a quiet revolution.

You can know more about ICAC at its official website: http://www.icac.org.hk/. In case you are wondering, how much dent did ICAC caused to the problem of corruption in Hong Kong, here is the latest Transparency International report. ref: http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/results

Hong Kong has been ranked as the 13th most honest country in the world with score of 8.4 out of 10. Whereas India has been ranked as 87th most honest country in the world with score of 3.3 out of 10. To understand more the meaning of score of 3.3/10 that our country, India, has been given, please note down the following data (ref: http://www.millionface.com/l/is-india-a-poor-country-revelation-on-swiss-bank-accounts/):

Black money in Swiss banks — Swiss Banking Association report, 2006 details bank deposits in the territory of Switzerland by nationals of following countries:

Top five
India—- $1,456 billion
Russia —$ 470 billion
UK ——-$390 billion
Ukraine – $100 billion
China —–$ 96 billion

Now do the maths – India with $1456 billion or $1.4 trillion has more money in Swiss banks than rest of the world combined.

This is what has been going on in India in last 6 decades – the most shameless and degraded people entered our political system to plunder the country whereas our wretched intelligentsia and spiritual class could not find any time from their relentless pursuit of personal pleasure and personal salvation respectively to bother about savage political ruin of the country.

Time to wake up now. It is now or never. It is do or die for us – we have suffered for 6 decades. Enough now. If Hong Kong can do this, why can India not do this? Support “India against Corruption” movement spearheaded by Sri Anna Hazare which aims to bring Jan Lokpal bill which will create the institution of Lokpal in India similar to ICAC of Hong Kong – a totally independent, anti-corruption agency which will have power to prosecute the corrupt politicians, bureaucrats and businessman and will have the selection procedure to bring the most honest people in it. The Jan Lokpal Bill calls for setting up Lokpal and Lokayuktas (in states) independent of government control. In the activists’ version, investigation in any case will have to be completed in one year, and punishment would be a jail term of minimum 5 years and maximum of life imprisonment. The government’s version recommends a prison term of minimum 6 months and maximum 7 years as punishment for corruption. To read a detailed comparison of Government proposed “protect the corrupt” Lokpal bill and Jan Lokpal bill, please read this link: http://www.indiaagainstcorruption.org/doc/how_will_civil_society_s_lokpal_bill_curb_corruption.pdf.

It is time to do or die to bring Jan Lokpal bill into existence so that the corrupt get punished for their anti-national deeds and India becomes free from the stench of corruption to a considerable extent. Decades from now, people will say the same thing about India then: “Once upon a time, in a nation corruption was at its zenith and then ….” – the public rose and forced the parliament to bring Lok Janpal bill and then, the corruption reached the nadir in that nation soon (with scores of corrupt politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen sent to jail and their ill-gotten wealth confiscated back to get used for public welfare).

Time for action. Send this post to all your friends and share it on online forums – the story of Hong Kong will surely inspire us to strengthen their devotion to “India against corruption” movement more and more.

Amen (Be it so)!

Jai Hind,
Gopal

7 Responses to “Once upon a time, in a nation corruption was at its zenith and then ….”

  1. [...] Once upon a time, in a nation corruption was at its zenith and then …. [...]

  2. Rajesh Tripathi said

    Gopal..I don’t doubt the importance of what you have written…but I am not sure if anna ji is not being manipulated from behind…for example look at the committee formed ..politics leading up to it…and aversion for institution of democracy…abusing all the neta’s is no solution…we have a legitimate way of throwing out a corrupt government and tht is election…and comparison with Hongkong are not FAIR ..it’s a small country unlike India..and easy to manage..what is the guarantee tht tommorow…this comittee will also not be corrupt…or corrupt people will not be appointed..to it like last CVC…I only hope …good sense prevails…

    • Gopal said

      I do not think, any person going into committee lacks integrity – these people are well-known for their integrity. I also do not think that we should wait for 5 years and allow all kinds of bad things to happen. We seriously need “right to recall” and a way for referendum so that 5-year election-cycle is not abused by political class like it has been done in past. Comparison with Hong Kong is partly true because the basic premises are the same – an independent and powerful anti-corruption agency. Independent – because we cannot allow conflict of interest by allowing government control over it. Powerful so that it can file chargesheet against the corrupt people rather than merely recommending to government like CVC does currently without any positive result. The chance of the committee getting corrupt is not zero, but it is much less than the chance of a committee appointed by government getting corrupt because the selection procedure will include top level people like Nobel laureates of Indian origin, Bharat Ratna awardees, CAG, Chief Election Commissioner, etc – believe me it will be much more difficult to corrupt all of these people in choosing a corrupt person, but if we leave to Government, we will continue to get tainted officers in anti-corruption agencies (refer to recent CVC fiasco).

      • Rajesh Tripathi said

        I agree with your right to recall point..it should be totally introduced..but I think fasting or these kind movements only give temporary solutions….I remember 26/11 outrage which was immediately put off by removing few people from the top..and then same party was re-elected in both the state and the centre…by voting out corrupt governments a solid and permanent positive atmosphere can be created where netas will have to be non-corrupt…somebody has got nobel prize in some filed doesn’t say anything abt his/her character..it only says tht he is only good in tht field…lot of these prizes are not totally apolitical…besides why should a foreign honour be considered a criteria for domestic appointment..?..

        • Gopal said

          It depends on the leadership. Temporary energies can also be productively used for lasting good. Anna Hazare Ji and his team is capable of doing lasting good.

          Regarding the character of Nobel Laureates: probability of them being non-corrupt and strong is much more than that of Manmohan Singh, Sharad Paward, et al. Also, Nobel prize is a global award, not a foreign award. Except peace prize, all other types of Nobel prizes are given to people of the highest merit. It is possible that some other deserving person did not get the Nobel prize, but whoever gets is always a deserving person (except of course, peace prize). Such a top level of merit can be generated generally using very high level of personal discipline. Add this fact that these people are scientists who do research mostly in academic institutions rather than going for making lots of money in industry, it is easy to understand that these people are less influenced by desire for wealth. So, I think, it is a good idea of have Nobel laureates of Indian origin (and some other top international awards like Magsasay) in the selection panel.

  3. There are two issues involved (1) Fight against corruption (2) Jan Lokpal Bill. I totally agree that corruption is rampant all over India and for this not only INC but other parties like BJP also are responsible. Today any one can set up a prize of any amount running in to millions of rupees “Show a non-corrupt politician and collect the money” There is no possibility of any one winning this money. Therefore, there is a need for fight against corruption. I have placed my views @ http://janahitwadi.blogspot.com/2010/10/preparations-needed-for-fighting.html
    b) http://janahitwadi.blogspot.com/2011/01/new-bank-accounts.html
    c) http://janahitwadi.blogspot.com/2011/01/direct-tax.html

    As regards second point i. e. Jan Lokpal Bill it is creating another pillar to support Indian Democratic System. There is a need to think over and first find whether any existing system can be modified to carry out these responsibilities. There is a possibility of re-organising JPC to include scholars in the committee and the head could be a social worker like honorable Anna Hazare. There is an obstacle though. It is not so easy to find a social worker always. This point also may be considered. Giving additional powers to the President may be useful and that possibility also should be checked. After checking all these possibilities Lokpal Bill should be considered.

    It is a laudable provision in the bill to fix time frame and give severe punishment like life imprisonment and hang to death. People may read this @ http://janahitwadi.blogspot.com/2011/04/jan-lokpal-bill-should-include-change.html . I appeal to all to take a firm decision but after assimilating my views as stated above.

  4. Anand said

    a timely post,gopal, thanks, i’ve sent your mail with this link to my contacts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 97 other followers